Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Satoshi is the only very high profile person I’m aware of to remain completely (pseud)onymous.

Many others have tried and failed (though they often broke the law, so that might be the main distinguishing factor)



Banksy

Daft Punk

Deadmau5

Members of KISS (for a while)

Blue Man Group

But if you're following the advice in this article...nobody should ever know that you're not actually a real person. So you might "know" lots of folks online who are not who they say they are.


The identity and face of Daft Punk are very well known. Thomas Bangalter and Guillaume-Manuel de Homem-Christo have been djing without mask outside of that specific project.


I don't think the members of KISS were ever anonymous. They wore makeup on stage but widely used their real names.


Deadmau5 isn't anonymous.


Banksy is way more famous than Satoshi and has remained pseudonymous


From what I understand art world folks very well know who Banksy is, but I don't think such is the case for the tech world and Satoshi.


Hardly just the art world. That he’s Robert Del Naja (aka 3D from Massive Attack) has been semi-public knowledge for a long time.


I love there's no reference of that in his wikipedia article directly, but it appears 3 times in the referenced source titles:

https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Robert_Del_Naja

Out of curiosity, why do you believe it's not Robin Gunningham?

That seems to be what https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banksy suggests, and the reasoning seems sound.


Proof? Please


Banksy is represented by the world's top gallerists. You think they don't know who they're doing business with?


Why would they care?

They just have to meet with Banksy's agent.

Knowing who Banksy is puts them at real risk of demystifying him/them and lowering their profit.


Yes.


Banksy is purportedly Robin Cunningham. Google is the greatest OSINT tool ever created.


that's just one theory. everything i've read lists both del naja and gunningham as possibilities at the least, and often tosses a couple of other names into the mix.


..and some others making fakes (that's why they ad it)


Anyone who has access to to passenger rosters of flights going in and out of Britain can figure out who he is pretty easily.


its only entertainment that Banksy is anonymous, the fact you haven't looked this up bolsters the point

personas are good enough information, it satisfies the curiosity well enough to not dig deeper


Satoshi also dropped off the face of the internet almost as soon as he became famous.


Law enforcement/intelligence services involvement raises the bar on maintaining anonymity a lot. They can access a lot of information that even an army of armchair sleuths probably can't.


Satoshi could be a government persona.


Not "monetarily" as high value as some of the other examples here, but Icefrog, the lead developer/game balancer for Dota and Dota 2 is also mostly pseudonymous.

I think if it weren't for some stupid comments by a League developer (?), no normal people would know who he is. Now, if you try hard enough, you can find his identity leaked in an old blog/forum post (?) and have it proven/corroborated in other areas online I think.


Because he’s not a real person. He’s a CIA or NSA project.

It’s like the group “Anonymous” that conveniently only shows up when the CIA has an objective and then disappears again.


Just another Nicolas Bourbaki crippled by threshold multisig cryptography I'm afraid.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: