Simply looking at the clock rate has never been the most useful metric when comparing CPUs.
Even back in the day a 33 MHz 486 DX was much faster than a 33 MHz 386 DX.
It’s better to look at benchmarks. Passmark is a good one. Its headline number is good for comparing performance in software that takes advantage of multiple cores. For that reason they also show single core performance to see how a cpu will performance relatively using games and apps that don’t use multiple cores.
Even back in the day a 33 MHz 486 DX was much faster than a 33 MHz 386 DX.
It’s better to look at benchmarks. Passmark is a good one. Its headline number is good for comparing performance in software that takes advantage of multiple cores. For that reason they also show single core performance to see how a cpu will performance relatively using games and apps that don’t use multiple cores.
Benchmarks for both chips:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i9-12900...
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=AMD+Ryzen+7+6800H&i...
In this case the Intel chip beats the AMD chip both in multi-core and single-core benchmarks.