Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Im sorry but this is just absurd conspiracy psychobabble. Throw words and buzzphrases together as much as you like, there is still no coherent understanding or argument behind your post. "The government" (or the Illuminati, or the Jews, or ...) wanting XYZ from you because they are evil/malicious/warmongering/control freaks is just a trope.

There is no reason why "the government" (who exactly?) needs a control mechanism in order to biologically profile and radicalise you. None of this babble passes Ockham's razor or basic reason.



lots of writing pre-modernity used to be satire, and with serious underlying warnings weaved throughout it hyperbole

why must every piece of shared information be viewed through the lens of conspiracies and mental instability?

i feel the tireless, never ending scroll has taken away peoples creative interpretations above all else


Look social media is not a basic single digit mental arithmetic test, you have to view it in the context of Divergent Thinking.

The Brick Test is a simple example, how many uses can you come up with for a house brick?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilford%27s_Alternate_Uses

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinking

Anyway I could argue you are using rule 4 from the section Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation found on this webpage https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

There are many tentacles to the state, which in itself can create cognitive dissonance, but the other problem you have is, you cant kill an idea. Take your anger out on a cop, the law prosecutes you for murder of a human, not a uniform, ergo you cant kill an idea, like law, religion & money.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: