>Perhaps we can start from the points I'm making and assess them on their own merits instead?
As far as I can tell, the points you made are:
A) It's strange people make moral choices to stay out of advertising.
B) Advertisement could be more targeted.
B is boring and I don't care.
A isn't really a point with merits to be debated.
I enjoy eating meat. But I don't call it "strange" everytime someone turns out to be vegetarian. I understand why they refrain from eating meat. It's not like I disavow the existence of the question of "should we eat meat?". I just disagree.
Perhaps we can start from the points I'm making and assess them on their own merits instead?