Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Peptides in this context are functional not dietary. When you eat protein it gets broken down and rebuilt into numerous proteins or used for energy. In this context they are taking a peptide which is just a short amino acid chain but it has very specific functional characteristics. Normally peptides don't make it past the digestive tract which would ruin their specific functional characteristics so, like insulin which is also a peptide, they must be injected to actually work


"Work" in what sense? Your body makes these out of the proteins it breaks down in your digestive system.


In the sense that administration of these peptides means that we want to increase their concentration over endogenous levels in order to have some effect


Why, though? Sounds like a lot of work for no real reward.


Why do you think there is no real reward


Well, what is it supposed to do? How are you supposed to tell if it makes a difference?


Let's take thymosin beta-4 as an example, it's a protein involved in actin polymerization which is a component of muscle. People use it as a performance enhancer, so theoretically if your ability to recover from high intensity training increases then you can tell it's working. Peptides are no different from other drugs besides the fact that they can be short to long sequences of amino acids

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thymosin_beta-4

There are a ton of different peptides that do different things so there is no "one thing a peptide is supposed to do"


Is this something you can actually measure? Or is it just an expensive and complicated source of warm fuzzies?


When people read "protein" they think food, however proteins can have physiological effects on the body. Human growth hormone, snake venom and insulin are all proteins, and they do far more than just provide nutrients.

Peptides are just small chain proteins, so the same rules apply.


I don't know man can you measure the effects of any other drug? Why do you think these are somehow different? Did you even read the wikipedia article I linked?

The peptide I mentioned is banned by the world doping agency, but it's probably because it just gives athletes a warm fuzzy feeling right?

At this point your comments seem intentionally disingenuous


> I don't know man can you measure the effects of any other drug?

I can measure my blood sugar and my blood pressure quite simply and that is what ensures me the medication I take is working.


Yes, the question was rhetorical.


There are subjective effects that are much harder to measure though, and these peptide injections fall into that area, as there are numerous environmental and genetic factors one would need to control for.


You say "these" like all peptides are in the category. I'm talking about ones like the one I mentioned earlier. Sure there are some ineffective peptides but there are also ineffective drugs. A peptide banned from sport by the world doping agency is not something with subjective effects




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: