I'm very confused how everyone thinks this looks good?
I can only speak for myself but I find the font hard to read. The background color is very distracting (and frankly ugly). When using code highlighting the foreground colors clash horribly imho.
The icons are small and on a large monitor hard to see. This is made worse by similarity between the icon color and background.
When I see this all I can think about is John Nunemaker's statment: "But we are hackers and hackers have black terminals with green font colors!"
On the bright side I like the name, and the command line tool is neat.
Dark background and light text is much more natural for a screen. Light background and dark text works for paper, but makes no sense on a screen, it's like staring into a lightbulb.
I wish someone (not my game, so it's best if it's not me) would combine:
- hastebin's elegant, simple and pretty UI;
- ideone's IDE features (compiling, running, debugging, ...)
- gist's concept of making pastes git repos with easily accessible history
Looks good, but fails at ideone's features. Also, not a git repo, although history is nice. In other news, I think you just replaced etherpad lite for me.
Right now it does not have realtime highlighting, but I think it is obvious to the first-time user what to do. Personally, I like the simple and easy-to-use interface as well as the information and control it gives you at the same time.
Very beautiful, but I think the future is actually something like http://ideone.com. I'd also like to be able to manually set the language for syntax highlighting purposes. I have to give these guys major props on the simplicity/prettiness of the UI and providing keyboard shortcuts for everything (even for twitter!).
EDIT: Oh, and like some other commenters I liked how the URLs are made of consonant-vowel pairs, so as to make them pronounceable. Very cool touch!
EDIT2: I promise to not edit this further, but I'd also like to congratulate them on the sane colorscheme. Very easy on the eyes, espec. compared to something like pastebin.com
Yes, this is a very nice feature. I noticed that mine was autodetected incorrectly[1] but just for shiggles I changed the extension to `.js`[2] and it highlighted properly.
Re pronounceable: I wonder if it makes any sense at all to use full words (from a dictionary), assembled into sentences (using a grammar). They'd be much longer, but (possibly) more readable and memorable. I'm sure this has been done - I wonder how it worked out?
Note I specified a grammar, though no semantics. This means sentences, that (usually) will be bizarre and surreal.
Like nonsense phonemes, nonsense sentences will (usually) not have any apparent meaning; though both can be suggestive.
A "random" example might be "acatimpliedoncolourlessphones.rb"
The key generation is swappable. Currently I have implemented "random" and "phonetic" but this would be a neat (and easy to add) addition. I'll look into it.
I'd say 80% of the ease of use of Hastebin is in the URL. ;) I'm going to remember it, probably whether I want to or not.
If I install the gem I only have to remember a five-character verb, and it's a fun verb.
"Pocoo" isn't even a word in my language, I have to remember a subdomain, and "pocoo.com" forwards to a random Chinese (?) e-commerce site that appears to sell tchotchkes.
The name “Pocoo” bears no meaning and multiple tries to find a suitable Backronym failed. It originally was chosen because it sounded “cute” and is now also the name of our logo owl. Pocoo is pronounced /ˈpokʉː/
With all those language, it didn't even have a proper Lisp! Big minus points for that. (It did have Scheme though, but that doesn't have the word "Lisp" in its name.)
Elegance is the point! Okay, so you spend a minute reading the usage page. Big deal. Learn it once and you're done. Plus you get an awesome Ruby Gem for pasting from the terminal! Definitely worth the 10 seconds it takes to figure out.
I like the simplicity of the interface, though it seems to insist that everything I save is Erlang code. I also wish the haste command wasn't a special Ruby client; something POST-driven like http://sprunge.us would be fantastic.
Unfortunately this includes substrings which aren't at all phonetic, like "qo". It would be nice to see a generator for actual pronounceable 'words', with consonant clusters, etc.
This is awesome! If you start getting a lot of traffic and want to monetize, I suggest making sure your ads are completely unobtrusive and keep them with the minimal design of the site. Ugly annoying ads are the downfall of most other paste sites.
First impressions is that the minimalism compromises usability. I did have to think for a moment.
(1) The control panel hides really long lines.
(2) Really long lines! A bigger gutter would be good on the right hand side. In fact, that would free up the entire right hand side for the controls and whatever else.
(3) The colour scheme got in the way for me, especially with syntax highlighting. Increasing font size drastically improved it for me so I have to ask, have you considered a bigger default font.
(4) Would be cool if you showed a list of recently edited documents (via cookies or whatever). That way I wouldn't accidentally lose stuff.
There are quite a few things I really like about it. It makes it really easy to quickly share something without having to choose the language for it to reasonably syntax-highlight (and the ability to change the URL for more precise highlighting is very nice).
My main gripe is the hotkeys. In the latest stable Chrome, some hotkeys (control+n, control+t) don't work, as they perform the native chrome operations (open new window, open new tab).
It comes up all the time as the reason web apps will never be able to compete with native apps. Pressing Ctrl-W in your text editor and having the window immediately close is one of the worst possible user experiences.
I for one don't like default actions being taken away from me. I use ^N ^T and ^W constantly, and a page taking them away from me would be extremely annoying.
If the page you were using was an editor using emacs keybindings, you may be very annoyed that chrome is the only browser that those keybindings don't work in.
what makes this even more annoying is that chrome makes it easy to create an application shortcut, so you can have a window that is just an online editor: so awesome! but it can't work with your keybindings! how do they say: oh snap!
Wow, this is really nice. 30 days seems a bit short though. I'd love to use this for testing (for projects that download from services on the internet) but if I don't run the test for a month, it'll break.
It might already be available, but I was unable to find it at first glance: is it possible to set pastes to expire? Private, expiring pastes are why I prefer Pastebin over sites like Pastie.
Other alternatives for publishing notes (not code):
* http://pen.io - for example PAGENAME.pen.io -- no account required, and you can edit if you have the password to the page, however you can't format the text)
* http://hackpad.com - account registration is quick and you can format your text
My thoughts exactly. I wrote a line of plain text and it thought it was .vbs. It got a .py right, but only because I made sure it was distinct enough from Ruby for it to know the difference.
what is it really? it took me some good effort to figure out what it was.. i still like pastebin more. Minimalism is apparently not always a good thing.
I can only speak for myself but I find the font hard to read. The background color is very distracting (and frankly ugly). When using code highlighting the foreground colors clash horribly imho.
The icons are small and on a large monitor hard to see. This is made worse by similarity between the icon color and background.
When I see this all I can think about is John Nunemaker's statment: "But we are hackers and hackers have black terminals with green font colors!"
On the bright side I like the name, and the command line tool is neat.