I would say your comment is the low quality one, when the thread just sketched out[1] why WF’s “safe” level ought to be similarly fatal, and you’re just restating the obvious with a lecture about how 28% is safer than 56%, which was never in dispute. And for the kicker, you threw in an aside, which I hope is a joke, that we should say false things just because we don’t like the target.
[1] Yes, my comment wasn’t explicit, but if you put in some effort and read the context or a sibling comment, you’ll see the justification.
[1] Yes, my comment wasn’t explicit, but if you put in some effort and read the context or a sibling comment, you’ll see the justification.