That the misuse of terminology has gotten large enough to have a wikipedia page doesn't mean it's not misuse. These policies are only "reminiscent" of feudalism in the minds of those who don't know the history of conventional capitalism.
..is rooted in feudalism isn't it... the mentality is similar, you nearly own people who can be grateful they are allowed to work for you, and you consider yourself more entitled than those.
the only däshift is from owning people born on your soil to nearly owning people who work for you.
and as they need these frickin "brains" for their work and that makes them crave "freedom" you have to give them as much freedom as needed --- and as little as it's sufficient --- so they move cash your way.
the term neo-feudalism is well understood and has a well defined meaning, as established by the mere existence of the Wikipedia article.
what we see is a concerted attempt of some golden faucets to push the world as feudal as can be. as little personal freedom, as much bubbling-up economy as possible.
it's a pushdiwn of social market economy via capitalism back to high tech neo feudalism.
