This is good thing. Managers can clarify their ideas using AI tools.
But still, the real product needs to be fleshed out, back and forth, interactively.
Regardless of whether it is the manager or engineer who commands the tool, you can't entrust the AI to get everything 100% right. Some one has to proofread it, and that is the bottleneck, or where the value of human kicks in.
A human brain can only hold that many details by itself. It can't maintain all the details live all at once, and some business do have overwhelming number of details. A one man team with help of infinite AIs to replace an actual team isn't useful.
At some point, that human will start to fail to verify the system generated by AI is actually what he/she wants.
But still, the real product needs to be fleshed out, back and forth, interactively.
Regardless of whether it is the manager or engineer who commands the tool, you can't entrust the AI to get everything 100% right. Some one has to proofread it, and that is the bottleneck, or where the value of human kicks in.
A human brain can only hold that many details by itself. It can't maintain all the details live all at once, and some business do have overwhelming number of details. A one man team with help of infinite AIs to replace an actual team isn't useful.
At some point, that human will start to fail to verify the system generated by AI is actually what he/she wants.