Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The discussion from the top used the term "people" in a very general way, at least to me, so I think my reply was relevant and I was asking you for more on your point of view. I now have a better understanding of what you mean because you clarified just now. However, you seem to have understood my point too so may I suggest in the interest of us all having a better time on here, that you to respond a bit more charitably when someone doesn't exactly get the point you are making. Thanks.


I did read your comment in a charitable way, which was why I replied as opposed to just ignore it. It's just generally a bit hard to get the wordings right in those kind of charged topic, so I opted for terseness. It might have come off as ruder than I intended, but that wasn't the plan.

The second half certainly wasn't directed to you, just more of a follow up as to why I wrote my original comment.


Thanks! I appreciate the response!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: