> I'm confused by this example, Jonathan Blow sounds identical to LANGUAGE EXPERTS here.
No, he doesn't. He lists what problems he's running into, the challenges he faces and what his language is trying to do to mitigate that.
The two presentations I've seen on Verse are: "look at this python-like language and its syntax" and "look at the types in this language!".
We've yet to see anything of any substance that actually describe the whys and the whats of the language beyond "oh yea we use STM to code for multiple servers" (which is a nonsensical statement)
No, he doesn't. He lists what problems he's running into, the challenges he faces and what his language is trying to do to mitigate that.
The two presentations I've seen on Verse are: "look at this python-like language and its syntax" and "look at the types in this language!".
We've yet to see anything of any substance that actually describe the whys and the whats of the language beyond "oh yea we use STM to code for multiple servers" (which is a nonsensical statement)