Right. Like the questions the OP poses that it got wrong make perfect sense to get wrong.
Knowing facts and being able to present them in conversational English is not the same as being able to solve linguistically presented puzzles... Even if it sometimes actually is capable of that by some miracle of the algorithm.
I think the tool might be so amazing people are fooled into thinking it is more than it is and therefore perceived as not amazing. Very strange psychology play there.
Knowing facts and being able to present them in conversational English is not the same as being able to solve linguistically presented puzzles... Even if it sometimes actually is capable of that by some miracle of the algorithm.
I think the tool might be so amazing people are fooled into thinking it is more than it is and therefore perceived as not amazing. Very strange psychology play there.