> Assuming by default everyone but you is a naïve doe lost in a forest and therefore lacks the intellect to contextualize anything for themselves is undemocratic.

Luckily not a claim I'm making. It's better for conversation if you reply to what I say, not misrepresentations thereof.

> Going back to the original question:

And I replied to it already, but I'll reiterate: I don't believe this change "can only" be a net positive, what makes you believe that is the case?