I was about to read his comment with interest to see what claims could be made... then I realised who wrote it.
I could look up a few of his past comments on an older account of his, but it's surely easier just to link to his personal site and let your assumptions take over from there.
Literally the only person I have ever found the need to speak negatively off on HN, as opposed to either agreeing or disagreeing with just their opinions.
Did you really just say that the distribution and ownership of child porn should be legal? I think you just did.
I refuse to argue vile shit like that but I have to tell you that it is indeed vile shit.