For one, assembly ceases to be a relevant detail and is replaced by other relevant details.
So, I can't code fast games in a 1984 workplace, currently, being too out of touch with assembly on a given chipset. But I also can't wave my hands at an LLM and expect a modern, fast game of the desired quality to code itself. (Even though a clip art-style result is possible, the requirements are always going to be special details)
The upwards direction example is also interesting because it's foundational to the cognitive functionality of one of the Jungian personality types. But other personality perspectives also apply to coding, which means in part that the directional, metaphorical-abstraction view can effectively be a blind spot if we map it as the preferred view on outcomes.
The most common blind spot for this personality involves questions of relevant details, and their intersection with planning for yet-unknowns. There is a tendency to hand-wave which ends up being similar to prophetic behavior. Jung called this the "voice in the wilderness" noting that it can easily detach from sensibility (rationality) by departing from life details. Kind of interesting stuff.
Ni-dominant. It exists nowadays in various post-Jungian models, many of which are really fascinating, having fleshed it out a lot.
The opposing function to Ni is Se, which creates a dichotomy of planning/foreseeing vs. doing/performing. The functions oscillate as a kind of duty cycle, so a lot of sages out there have hobbies as musicians, stage magicians, etc.
This dichotomy also effectively shuts out detail memory for context, dealing mostly with present vs. future. Even nostalgia is often ignored on the daily. So a Ni-dom will usually describe their memory as pattern-based, gestalt, more vague or general, etc.
I couldn't quite tell if you found a beautiful way to insult me, but it is fascinating indeed. I am hand wavey and I understand its failure modes quite well, unfortunately. It's cool to talk about it at this level of abstraction.
No insult intended... I don't really know how much it applies in your case, but since you really took on that viewpoint, that's when the personality theory side of me goes, "well if this is a favored viewpoint then there IS this idea about the population that favors this viewpoint" :-) And thoughts about GPT are generally crafted from general personality positions, in the absence of other relevant self-development experience.
So, I can't code fast games in a 1984 workplace, currently, being too out of touch with assembly on a given chipset. But I also can't wave my hands at an LLM and expect a modern, fast game of the desired quality to code itself. (Even though a clip art-style result is possible, the requirements are always going to be special details)
The upwards direction example is also interesting because it's foundational to the cognitive functionality of one of the Jungian personality types. But other personality perspectives also apply to coding, which means in part that the directional, metaphorical-abstraction view can effectively be a blind spot if we map it as the preferred view on outcomes.
The most common blind spot for this personality involves questions of relevant details, and their intersection with planning for yet-unknowns. There is a tendency to hand-wave which ends up being similar to prophetic behavior. Jung called this the "voice in the wilderness" noting that it can easily detach from sensibility (rationality) by departing from life details. Kind of interesting stuff.
(Ni-dominant type)