> Impressive timing on that prediction assuming GPT-4's release on March 14th counts as "superhuman intelligence".
How many legs does a dog have, if you assume a tail is a leg?
Four. Assuming it doesn't make it so.
In the same way, you can assume whatever you want, but GPT-4 is not "superhuman intelligence". It just isn't, for any meaningful definition of those words.
>> In the same way, you can assume whatever you want, but GPT-4 is not "superhuman intelligence". It just isn't, for any meaningful definition of those words.
It's also not 2030 yet, so the prediction has 7 more years to be false in its full form. If it happens in 2040 will people be upset that it was 10 years later than predicted?
Yes, that's what ChatGPT says: Assuming that a tail is a leg does not actually make it a leg. Dogs have four legs, regardless of the length of their tail.
So the fact that it might have outsmarted you means it is not intelligent?
I think humans tend to have a definition of intelligence that is too far fetched in my opinion. They confluate it with things like conscience, meaningfulness etc, which just might be human hallucinations.
How many legs does a dog have, if you assume a tail is a leg?
Four. Assuming it doesn't make it so.
In the same way, you can assume whatever you want, but GPT-4 is not "superhuman intelligence". It just isn't, for any meaningful definition of those words.