>Interesting how our leaders see their role not as representing our interests, but in shaping our interests.
That's the very definition of "leader". It's exactly what leaders are supposed to do: "lead". They're supposed to have a vision, and get other people to follow them to achieve that vision.
What you're advocating for is a "manager" or an "administrator", not a "leader".
That's the very definition of "leader". It's exactly what leaders are supposed to do: "lead". They're supposed to have a vision, and get other people to follow them to achieve that vision.
What you're advocating for is a "manager" or an "administrator", not a "leader".