Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


I think they were trying to say "The point is that the patient's story is neither complete nor consistent." and it makes sense to me that way.


If you can’t deal with a one-character typo in a comment, then ChatGPT certainly has you beat. The bot paranoia is the icing on the cake.

Calling this an “internal process” that’s none of your concern, a much more egregious wilful misrepresentation of this situation. There is a situation or phenomenon of human behaviour, this is how the healthcare system deals with it.

Who are you as presumably some software person to come in telling them to knock the gate down without understanding why it was put there in the first place? God knows you’d hate it if someone did that to you in your area of expertise. I understand that the proliferation of VC-backed money-losing companies which parachute clueless software people into other domains have given developers an undue sense of transferable expertise, but perhaps exercise some self-awareness.


You need to check your attitude and eat a big piece of humble pie. You will never get anywhere in life acting like a preachy know it all.

If you are still thinking of making another snarky reply, then you truly are lost. Be a better person.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: