... until for profiting goes against developing a good service.
> I think github, after stackoverflow, is the best thing that happened to developers.
I don't think github is bad tooling (there are worse), but the best thing for developer?
I don't see anything on github that is greatly better than what we have in other services.
Github was a huge step up at the time, compared to Sourceforge and Google Code and the like. Git itself helped, since checking out code from Subversion and CVS didn't give you the history, so you'd lose that if you wanted to publish your own fork.
> I think github, after stackoverflow, is the best thing that happened to developers.
I don't think github is bad tooling (there are worse), but the best thing for developer? I don't see anything on github that is greatly better than what we have in other services.