>Title III prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities by businesses open to the public (also referred to as “public accommodations” under the ADA). The ADA requires that businesses open to the public provide full and equal enjoyment of their goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to people with disabilities. [...]
>A website with inaccessible features can limit the ability of people with disabilities to access a public accommodation’s goods, services, and privileges available through that website—for example, a veterans’ service organization event registration form.
>For these reasons, the Department has consistently taken the position that the ADA’s requirements apply to all the goods, services, privileges, or activities offered by public accommodations, including those offered on the web.
The courts also found that Netflix was a public accomodation in 2015 as part of a lawsuit, and Netflix was forced to provide subtitles on 100% of their programming.
> If they put up a community bulletin board, no reasonable person would expect them to rip down anything that doesn't include Braille.
If there was a readily-available bulletin board that cost somewhat more, but that automatically displayed in Braille to the side any posted items, a reasonable person might expect that they go with the expensive Auto-Braille-Board.
And a reasonable person would very likely expect them not to go with the bulletin board that actively obfuscates the ability of people to use their own photo-to-speech devices on posted items.
Title III prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities by businesses open to the public (also referred to as “public accommodations” under the ADA)
Reddit is definitely a business open to the public.
The definition for public accommodation is purposely ambiguous, but so far, it seems no one has tried to make the case that a site like Reddit would count as one.
