The chance that LLMs won't be able to produce text in a certain style is extremely low.
What is true, is that by default ChatGPT doesn't produce the same style as academic papers, which seems unsurprising. You could also compare it to a 15 year old writing text messages and conclude that ChatGPT content is identifiable by that metric, which, again, seem unsurprising.
I had to try to ask it to rewrite this to 15yo text speak, and while I 100% agree with you, it clearly needs some more detail prompting to get a result that doesn't sound like an adult trying and failing to pass for a teenager. Funny, though:
> So like, for real, ChatGPT doesn't spit out stuff that sounds like those super boring academic papers by default, which is like totally no shocker, right? I mean, you could even compare it to us teens textin' and all, and you'd find out that ChatGPT vibes are different, and, honestly, who's surprised by that? Lol.
What is true, is that by default ChatGPT doesn't produce the same style as academic papers, which seems unsurprising. You could also compare it to a 15 year old writing text messages and conclude that ChatGPT content is identifiable by that metric, which, again, seem unsurprising.