Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The above was only a case against wishful thinking and rationalization. Of course expert testimony is still some form of evidence. The point is not to willfully ignore or reinterpret the evidence because you don't like the direction it is pointing at.

It is worth citing the Litany of Gendlin:

What is true is already so.

Owning up to it doesn't make it worse.

Not being open about it doesn't make it go away.

And because it's true, it is what is there to be interacted with.

Anything untrue isn't there to be lived.

People can stand what is true,

for they are already enduring it.



What was that old definition of ideology, an unreal relation to real facts?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: