> Nintendo is exempt from GPLv2 licensing and may (at its option) instead license any source code authored for the libmesosphere project under the Zero-Clause BSD license.
Er, what? Why would a 3rd-party reimplementation allow Nintendo to use their work?
Probably because it's based entirely on (non-black-box) reverse-engineered Switch binaries, and is therefore very possibly a derivative work of Nintendo's copyrighted code.
Literally nothing I have ever read about Nintendo makes me think this would even give them a moment of pause as they sue the author into oblivion. (This is a comment on Nintendo's behavior, not the legality of the author's actions.)
Er, what? Why would a 3rd-party reimplementation allow Nintendo to use their work?