Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

its clear Meta are trying quite hard to piggyback Threads off the more palatable brand of Instagram rather than Facebook. However ultimately it's all still the same company, the same data mining and ad/influencing platform.

It's an interesting strategy, the app on the Apple App Store is published by "Instagram Inc" rather than Meta, prominently named as "Threads, an Instagram App". They could have launched it as a completely separate brand, but that would have required marketing such as "the new app from Meta", and everyone more closely associates Meta with Facebook.

It's quite surprising they never launched a microblogging network before, but I suppose they have never really launched a new network, only ever acquired them... does that show that they feel threatened, have weakening market position, and need a new direction?




Well this is an alternative to Twitter, a company which lied about needing phone numbers for 2FA and then used them for targeted ads.

> does that show that they feel threatened, have weakening market position, and need a new direction?

It shows they are trying to capitalize on Twitter’s dumpster fire, and for the first time there is a mainstream competitor. Sorry Mastodon. Every time Twitter bugs out, people will go to Threads. Some may never go back to Twitter.


> Every time Twitter bugs out, people will go to Threads

Wait, I thought it's supposed to be Bluesky? Three months ago they were totally probably maybe going to incinerate Twitter.


Bluesky still has a waiting list. Threads doesn't.


I can't imagine a more backwards decision than to have a waiting list to sign up for a social networking site.


Makes sense, targeting the younger crowd. They're on 'Insta' not Facebook.


People also associate Meta with "metaverse", aka failure.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: