I mean, that would arguably be false balance. When a bad thing happens, it is reasonable to expect the coverage to generally be negative, because bad things are bad.
For the vast majority of users, it'd be very difficult to put much of a good spin on the past 9 months or so at Twitter.
> For the vast majority of users, it'd be very difficult to put much of a good spin on the past 9 months or so at Twitter.
I really think that "false balance" line is trite and overused. That's just your perspective. Even if most users agreed with you [1], the number of people who felt their voices are being silenced before is definitely quite significant. Giving zero attention to that fact is just plain bias.
[1]: And the numbers are not clear on that. Despite all the ridiculous headlines, Twitter hasn't died yet.
For the vast majority of users, it'd be very difficult to put much of a good spin on the past 9 months or so at Twitter.