Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Simple setups will be as simple with Kubernetes.

That is true if you already have Kubernetes. If you don't, then you still need to run and configure the Kubernetes' control plane (e.g. kube-apiserver, etcd, scheduler, etc). Doing that alone may exceed the complexity of a simple setup.

I say this as someone who has looked at Kubernetes a lot and wanted to use it, but could never justify it. I have concluded multiple times that docker compose is a better fit for my use case.

> However with Kubernetes your infrastructure will be ready to scale.

True, but for many purposes you aren't gonna need it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it



k3s is a super easy way of deploying kubernetes in a linux machine.


I haven't used k3s, but I will check it out.


kubeadm init is all you need to run and configure everything. It's installed via dep/rpm.


I almost spilled my coffee, seriously.

I hope you're not putting something like that in production.


Statements like these offer zero value, maybe you could qualify it with some reasoning?


kubeadm alone is maybe 40% of what a production Kubernetes platform is. Just running init and deploying your app is good for a toy project or really small scale cluster.

Every time you hear yourself saying Kubernetes, "only", and "just" on the same sentence, please pause for a moment.


I'm running kubeadm-powered cluster in production for a year and couldn't be happier about it. Absolutely zero issues.


That's not the point. I too have managed kubeadm clusters mostly without issues. The tool is solid.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: