1. So, if they do not plan to leave the team they can skip it?
2. Why do you need this details? Why you did not recieve this details in the firts place?
3. As any other writing. If you believe that this skills should be improved then why not use some training? And again, if person writing skills is already good then its ok to skip it then?
> So far, I receive positive feedback on this.
Positive honest feedback from subordinate? Did you provide any alternative they can choose?
1. Yes, people can skip it. I can never force someone to do this and it's typically something only career driven engineers want to participate. I do have an 80% volunteer participation rate in my current team.
2. I need the details because I don't look over the shoulders of my engineers. I always evaluate the end product and provide support when asked. But if a design doc required an engineer to go escalate and issue with another teams director, how would I know that? Anytime they show initiative, by definition it would be without my knowledge.
3. This part of the training.
For the positive feedback, I am the highest rated manager for manage satisfaction in my org of 400 engineers. This is from anonymous survey results. This has been consistent through my past 4 companies, including multiple FANNGs.
2. Why do you need this details? Why you did not recieve this details in the firts place?
3. As any other writing. If you believe that this skills should be improved then why not use some training? And again, if person writing skills is already good then its ok to skip it then?
> So far, I receive positive feedback on this.
Positive honest feedback from subordinate? Did you provide any alternative they can choose?