OK, but the hard part was the "intelligent" part, right? If you have the "intelligent" thing, and you want to get an "intelligent agent", all you have to do at most is wrap it in a shell script that runs the equivalent of an OODA loop, e.g. AutoGPT.
No, not really.
Neither AutoGPT or any similar actually work. And the only justification for expecting them to work the future is same naively extrapolation more of one kind of quality will automatically give a thing more of a correlated quality.
The humming bird building airplanes: "If we continue to increase the capacity of these flying machines, eventually they will have 'super-bird abilities' and at that point they will naturally steal all of nectar..."
AutoGPT doesn't work because GPT-4 is too stupid to make good plans, not because it's missing the secret sauce of "agentiness." If some future software was really great at observing, planning, and reasoning, then an AutoGPT-like wrapper would make it good at autonomously doing things, too.
No, not really.
Neither AutoGPT or any similar actually work. And the only justification for expecting them to work the future is same naively extrapolation more of one kind of quality will automatically give a thing more of a correlated quality.
The humming bird building airplanes: "If we continue to increase the capacity of these flying machines, eventually they will have 'super-bird abilities' and at that point they will naturally steal all of nectar..."