> My point is very simple: I can do it too, in any language I want, and so there's nothing special about lisp.
The big difference is: "I can do it too" means YOU need to do it. Lisp does it for me already, I have not to do anything. I don't want to know what you claim you can do with C++, show me where C++ does it for you.
Telling me "I can do it too" is not a good answer. Show me where the language implementation (!) does it for you.
My point is very simple: I can do it too, in any language I want, and so there's nothing special about lisp.