Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The money needs to come from somewhere. I'd rather not have the costs concentrated on the sick. We do have plenty of money to fund everything we need if we pull our military out of most foreign countries. I believe that Nasa's annual budget, for example, is roughly the same cost as 1 day in Iraq [citation needed].


In 2011, we spent 700 billion on the defense department, and we spent 1,205 billion dollars more than we took in. It's time to stop thinking of the government as a free money fountain.

I'd suggest it's much cheaper to look into how we could reduce the regulations making it so expensive, rather than throw government money at a problem of the government's creation. At the point where we are seriously talking about the entire edifice collapsing one must take seriously the question whether the costs of our regulatory regime have managed to exceed the benefits. Right now we have a terribly irrational balance between those who are hurt taking insufficiently vetted drugs vs. those who are hurt by not having drugs available for years that turn out safe. The former are visible and the latter invisible, but they are still real. A classic recipe for irrationality.


I'd suggest it's much cheaper to look into how we could reduce the regulations making it so expensive

That part's pretty easy. Reduce the guarantees we require demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of new drugs.


> In 2011, we spent 700 billion on the defense department, and we spent 1,205 billion dollars more than we took in.

We also took in hundreds of billions less than we would have if not for the avoidable economic implosion and earlier ill-advised tax cuts.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: