Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> vaccine harm advocates

At least we need a honest discussion instead of obviously biased propaganda. I did no vax because of just biasness on any type of mass media, and now the vax is just not needed any more for anything. But I am totally OK about other vaccines which discussion is not so greedily (I mean not just sources with 1M+ of subscribers but proably 100+ ones too) are being controlled by big brother.

> anthropogenic climate change “deniers”

They do it because of money, we can not ban them because it means banning most of our economy.

> people who claim life begins at conception

We can not ban them because this is what average Joe thinks. And average Joe's average teachers.

> dark matter “deniers,” and big bang “deniers,”

This is too complicated topic to be understandable by masses but the opposite is to ban people who are honestly wrong.

PS I clicked to your post to vouch it, because I consider your point as important too, but all I can not do is just upvote, somehow a vouch option is not available here for me.




I think vouch only shows up when it's [flagged][dead] or [dead], not when it's only [flagged]


I asked a rhetorical question and tried to make it balanced by giving a wide range of examples. Unfortunately that just made most people who read it upset. But I'm glad some readers agree it's worth thinking about.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: