C isn't C++. Most of what you know today applies to older compilers as well, with only a handful of features added over the years. You aren't going all the way back to K&R calling syntax here, I'm assuming you will target C89. You will just have to remember to declare all of your variables at the top of each function and the stdint types won't be available. There are a few other things added over the years, but its going to be pretty much the C you know and love.
> You will just have to remember to declare all of your variables at the top of each function
This is still idiomatic to the C community, even if it isn't strictly required any longer. About the only place it's ignored is inline variables for loops.
I write C primarily for hobby projects, and I only started with C ~10 years ago, so I'm likely in the minority that considers this a code smell for new C code. I don't want to needlessly extend the scope of my local variables!
Different story of course if you're targeting C89 or older, which I'm actually doing in my current project. I'm writing software on and for my old 68k Macintosh.
We might be saying the same thing here, but modern C scopes variables down to the block. So if you have a variable declared for instance inside of a for loop or if statement, that variable is out of scope once you exit the block.
This will fail to compile with an "undeclared identifier" error:
Pedantically you are correct, but it is and was common to use C++ compilers as a slightly more convenient dialect of C. This gives you the performance and simplicity of the C language with some very nice quality of life improvements.
With few exceptions, C++ can mostly be treated as a superset of C.
What I was trying to say is that if you're comfortable using modern C++ and try to switch back to a C++ compiler from the early 90s you are going to find a lot of the features you regularly use suddenly being absent. With C this is much less of an issue.
IIRC they were also available as “non-standard” feature in compilers at the time before being added to c99 (e.g. I’m pretty sure gcc in the late 90s supported all of these if you didn’t force c89 compatibility).
