Second this. Just adding fats and protien to a meal effect the meal’s glycemic index (even though it does nothing to glycemic load). I did a lot of research both times my wife was gestational diebetic, and while I already knew that fats helped to smooth bloodsugar levels, it was still wierd to see a dataset with toast having one of the highest glycemic while buttered toast was significantly lower on the scale.
This is trying to solve the wrong problem. Juvenile diabetes is almost always a human problem - not one of optimizing for treatment.
If you have a kid in their teens or 20's who is not entirely ignoring it out of spite, you're way ahead of the game. This problem is much harder to solve than tracking carbs and insulin doses, or changing diet/etc.
The person has to be ready to attack it. And for many young folks (and I assume older as well) this is where the problem lies. It takes a lot to really accept this is going to be your entire life, especially at an age where everyone (seemingly) around you are living these amazing care-free young adult lives, while you have this constant monkey on your back being a buzzkill. Very few individuals have the desire to "do their research" and start hacking on their health the way the HN community would tend to approach things.
Short of commenting on how heartbreaking it is as a parent to watch your kid go through this, I really have no good answers. I guess the topic of this discussion is it - a magic device you can slap on once a week and never think about again. Short of a device like that, I can't see this problem turning to technical vs. human any time soon.
If you think of our brains as a complex electrochemical reaction, the concept of activation energy is in play. And I just think that for some people in some situations their mind doesn’t have the wiring to generate sufficient potential gradient to achieve the activation energy required to motivate action. They can’t just will a thing, they need to rewire their brain first.
