I like how there's a condescending attitude against prudes through the whole article, and then they have to backtrack and say that the pornographic part probably had nothing to do with Ender's Game and had to do with other, actual pornographic material that the teacher was reading to the students. And even then, they wait until the very end to say that "the rest appears to be little more than rumor". Who needs facts to get in the way of pushing an agenda.
"It's a little odd that the school would maintain it was just the books if this wasn't the case."
Is it so odd? I think it's the school trying to protect the teacher. Just look at the situation in Los Angeles. Many reports of teacher molestation are coming out in the wake of the Miramonte scandal. Parents refused to send their children to Miramonte Elementary after it was revealed that a teacher engaged in despicable acts with students, and the parents were angry that they were not informed sooner. And its possible that more complaints about teacher abuse are swept under the rug, since a deal made between the teachers' union in LA and the LA school district expunges a teacher's record of unproven allegations after four years. They envisioned it would protect teachers against punishment for "petty" misconduct (being late/absent too much, messy, etc.) but never envisioned it would be used to protect teachers from sexual harassment accusations.
There is more to this story than what is out there now. The teacher is being protected, and they probably won't tell us what is really going on until more parents come out demanding to know the truth. LA is not an isolated incident, unfortunately. Some particularly bad characters have eroded the trust parents have in teachers, and then teachers react demanding protections, and the same bad characters abuse these protections to save their hide when allegations of misconduct pop up. The whole truth has not come out, and we will probably not like it when it does.
"It's a little odd that the school would maintain it was just the books if this wasn't the case."
Is it so odd? I think it's the school trying to protect the teacher. Just look at the situation in Los Angeles. Many reports of teacher molestation are coming out in the wake of the Miramonte scandal. Parents refused to send their children to Miramonte Elementary after it was revealed that a teacher engaged in despicable acts with students, and the parents were angry that they were not informed sooner. And its possible that more complaints about teacher abuse are swept under the rug, since a deal made between the teachers' union in LA and the LA school district expunges a teacher's record of unproven allegations after four years. They envisioned it would protect teachers against punishment for "petty" misconduct (being late/absent too much, messy, etc.) but never envisioned it would be used to protect teachers from sexual harassment accusations.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-banks-20120317,0,693...
There is more to this story than what is out there now. The teacher is being protected, and they probably won't tell us what is really going on until more parents come out demanding to know the truth. LA is not an isolated incident, unfortunately. Some particularly bad characters have eroded the trust parents have in teachers, and then teachers react demanding protections, and the same bad characters abuse these protections to save their hide when allegations of misconduct pop up. The whole truth has not come out, and we will probably not like it when it does.