I agree with others that this sort of guidance is in no way proof of malfeasance but I can also see why it might arouse suspicion.

If a suspected mob boss is recorded telling members of their organization stop using words like "murder", "assassinate", and "intimidate" that would not be proof of a crime, maybe they are an upstanding business owner who simply wants their employees to stop using violent metaphors.

But it would be suspicious and seems reasonable for a prosecutor to bring up in court.