I don’t think that’s the argument you think it is. Thought experiment, grab a random USB C cable, now tell me:
1. What speed can you transfer data through it?
2. How much power can it deliver?
3. Can it support video over USB C?
4. Say a random device comes with a USB-A cable on one side and a USB-c on the other. Now take a standard usb c/usb c cable, will it always charge the device?
Also when that same government first wanted to “standardize”. They wanted to standardize on micro-USB.
> Thought experiment, grab a random USB C cable, now tell me
Oh, easy. Apple already solved this one; if it has the Thunderbolt logo, it's maxed out. If it's anything else, you're usually getting at least 5w charging and USB 2.0 speeds. In other words, the worst-case scenario is usually slightly better than Lightning.
I travel with a portable monitor that gets power and video from one USB-c cable. It works with both my personal MacBook Air and my work Windows laptop.
> So your solution to making sure that you get the most compatibility is to buy Apple cables for Apple devices…meet the new boss.
I was hoping you'd bite the hook, but not like this...
Intel actually designed the spec, drivers and IC controllers for Thunderbolt. Apple consulted on it with USB-IF, but they don't own the spec like they do with Lightning. They're less of a new boss, and more subsuming their rightful position as a valued consultant on a shared standard. It's a good (albeit old) example of Apple doing the right thing through the right channels.
1. What speed can you transfer data through it?
2. How much power can it deliver?
3. Can it support video over USB C?
4. Say a random device comes with a USB-A cable on one side and a USB-c on the other. Now take a standard usb c/usb c cable, will it always charge the device?
Also when that same government first wanted to “standardize”. They wanted to standardize on micro-USB.