The vagueness of this comment and its perceived derogatory nature is merely a result of my ignorance around these technologies. It was not meant the way you perceived it.
That said, I looked at 2/3 a while ago:
- rqlite looks great and mature, though it has a HTTP interface, so I'll need to rewrite my database layer anyway to use it. At that point might as well to Postgres
- dqlite seemed like a failed Canonical experiment to me last time I checked, but looking again I think I may have had the wrong impression.
This feels like an uncharitable interpretation of the maturity of projects like LiteFS/rqlite/dqlite.