You used this word, evidence. I don't think it means what you think it means.
Parent made an argument by analogy, no evidence needs to enter the picture. At best you can say his analogy is flawed.
It's not even flawed, anyway. If cars not being allowed is supposed to refute the analogy, then an obvious answer would be that Othello playing programs could also banned in Othello competitions (given that the solution can't just be internalized by a human player).
Parent made an argument by analogy, no evidence needs to enter the picture. At best you can say his analogy is flawed.
It's not even flawed, anyway. If cars not being allowed is supposed to refute the analogy, then an obvious answer would be that Othello playing programs could also banned in Othello competitions (given that the solution can't just be internalized by a human player).