Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

These things simply don't compare.

Any such attempt smells like trolling to me.

System that are shitty by accident, do not compare to intentional evil.



Is it by accident though? Aren't US regulators intentionally (but quietly) pressuring financial institutions to do the enforcement of policies that they know wouldn't stand up to public scrutiny?


look, US politics is a shitshow, regulators are beholden to politics, lobbying is a very big influence in the US. from the crazy anti-porn, anti-abortion, anti-gay/trans, anti-welfare xenophobic fundamentalist anti-anything lobby to the anti-gun, super-duper-pro-trans, militantly-feminist, pro-eat-the-rich lobby.

and during all this banking in the US suffers from all the usual problems, it's 50+ regulatory regimes all in one, banking systems are laughably ambivalent old and legacy plus too new and full of bugs, and so on.

it's not surprising that things are not ideal. there's no need for some extreme conspiracy. big banks are user-hostile. just as the police, as healthcare, and so on.


Are things like Operation Chokepoint [1] still a conspiracy theory?

It appears to me like a sophisticated and coordinated operation, not the accidental result of bureaucracy.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Choke_Point


... it was announced in a public speech on March 20 that year (2013), it was all kinds of bad (very ineffective and probably extralegal, etc)... but it wasn't a secretive conspiracy. (despite what Wikipedia writes.)

https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/financial-fraud-enforceme...


> crazy anti-porn

Nothing crazy about that. It's very harmful to women, and doesn't do the consumers of it much good either.


citation needed

this has the same energy as "video games are making us killers", "tabletop RPGs directly lead to Satan (no chance of ever getting back)", "reefer madness, not even once", and so on.

are there negative consequences with regards to women? sure, as with many things.

is it "harmful to women"? oh, yes, maybe we need to put blinders on women and assign a guardian to them to help them avoid this harm!


It's at the least very weird that it's illegal to pay someone for sex unless you pay them to have sex with someone else, record it, and sell the resulting recording.


> System that are shitty by accident

US banks aren't shitty by accident - how could anyone say such a thing. They deleted millions of mandatory records. They manipulate markets. They fund illegal wars, and people like Epstein. They support dictators and tax dodgers. And that's all just JPM! Look at what GMS have done; look at the Panama papers, look at the 08 bailouts.

Giving banks the benefit of the doubt requires extraordinary, profound naivety.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: