> Perhaps the author is biased/doesn't understand common use cases because SQLite has a famously thorough test suite that almost nobody else comes close to
I'm sure they understand the use cases quite well, and designed their Fossil VCS to address these faults.
> And that's pretty much exactly what git rebase is...
Except rebase disconnects it from the history where the author's solution does not. A view on a SQL table does not change the underlying data, it just presents it differently. That's the difference between what the author's proposal and yours.
I'm sure they understand the use cases quite well, and designed their Fossil VCS to address these faults.
> And that's pretty much exactly what git rebase is...
Except rebase disconnects it from the history where the author's solution does not. A view on a SQL table does not change the underlying data, it just presents it differently. That's the difference between what the author's proposal and yours.