Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Blaming short life expectancy on the US healthcare system is pointing to a tree in a forest.

There are A LOT of reasons for this. For example fentanyl probably took quite a bit off it, considering over 200,000 people are dead at this point from it.

So does the obesity crisis.

Now - I think we are probably more in agreement than not, I think there are huge issues with the US healthcare system, the entire fentanyl crises WAS created by the healthcare system, but still - I don't think the root issue, or problem to be solved is private vs public. Switching to public would just mean another set of problems.

For the record, I'm not from the US, and I mostly use private healthcare, despite there being so called free healthcare available in my country. It's just terrible. So it's almost the same as the US - rich people get healthcare, poor don't.



At least in Poland private healthcare is great when it comes to simple procedures, but as soon as you have serious health issues you end up in a public hospital.


If you don’t stratify life expectancy by demographics, it means nothing.

Asians in the US live to be 10 years older than Blacks.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_health_in_the_Unite...

Clearly lifespan is not solely determined by where you live.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: