Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

My feeling is the the commercial side of the OpenAI brand is gone. How could OpenAI customers depend on the company, when the non-profit board goes against their interests (by slowing down the development and giving them inferior product)?

On the other hand, the AGI side of the OpenAI brand is just fine. They will continue the responsible AGI development, spearheaded by Ilya Sutskever. My best wishes for them to succeed.

I suspect Microsoft will be filing a few lawsuits and sabotaging OpenAI internally. It's an almost $3Tn company and they have an army of lawyers. They can do a lot of damage, especially when there may not be much sympathy for OpenAI in Silicon Valley's VC circles.




It's a bad idea to make yourself dependent on a new service from the outset.

They could have gone bankrupt, been sued into the ground, taken over by Microsoft...

Just look at the just because they fired their CEO.

Was the success based on GPT or the CEO?

The former is still their and didn't get inferior.

Slower growth doesn't mean shrinking


As an AI professional, I am very interested to hear about OpenAI's ideas, directions, safety programs, etc...

As a commercial customer, the only things I am interested in is the quality of the commercial product they provide to me. Will they have my interests in mind going forward? Will they devote all their energy in delivering the best, most advanced product to me? Will robust support and availability be there in the future? Given the board's publicly stated priorities (which I was not aware of before!), I am not so sure anymore.


>Will they have my interests in mind going forward? Will they devote all their energy in delivering the best, most advanced product to me?

Sorry to burt you bubble but the primary motivation of a for-profit company is ... profit.

If they make more money in screwing you, they will. Amazon, Google, Walmart, Microsoft, Oracle etc.

The customer is never a priority, just a means to an end.


Absolutely. I totally agree with the sentiment. But, at least make an effort to pretend that you care! Give me something... OpenAI does not even pretend anymore. :-) The board was pretty clear. That's not a good sign for the customers.


Seems like MS tries to force Altman back in.

If they succeed, we'll see how much MS cares.


I wonder if this represents a shift away from the LLM being the headline product. Their competitors are rapidly catching up in that space.


I am curious what happens to ChatGPT now.

If it's true that this is in part over Dev day and such, and they may have a point, however if useful stuff with AI that helps people is gauche is OpenAI just going to turn into increasingly insular cult? ClosedAI but this time you can't even pay for it?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: