Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Letting them earn further aids restitution.

These things have a balance, though. If you're planning on letting people out of prison one day (i.e. if they don't have a life sentence)...

And it's punitive to the point that familial relations break and people lose what little support network they have and ability to live outside of prison...

You can expect they're going to show back right up where they started. In which case, by facilitating repeated recidivism, you've neutered deterrence, incapacitation and left them unable to make meaningful restitution.




Even for life sentences I believe it makes sense to have prisoners work and earn some small privileges inside.

For one its possible to encourage good behaviour by threatening to take it away but also because a sense of purpose and achievement is important for a healthy mental state. That's true for incarcerated people as well and a stable population reduces enforcement costs and churn among the guard personal.


No one's arguing with that (though, of course, the devil is in the details...)

Just, the combination of:

- Denying people the practical ability to contact their loved ones except by phone

- Charging a price that is very high compared to outside rates for this contact (prohibitively so)

- Paying prisoners a tiny fraction of outside rates, such that

- Only people who can depend upon money coming from outside can contact family

is both cruel and probably increases recidivism.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: