That's ok. You get to be impressed or not impressed by whatever impresses or doesn't impress you. Maybe nothing is impressive! I'm extremely fine with a statement like that.
I question whether your bounding the human time to a minute is valuable here though. If the jumbled content were multiple pages long instead of only 23 words, would it be somehow more impressive despite the process being exactly the same?
> I am having a hard time overcoming the likelihood that scrambled and cipher-encoded words/solutions are part of the training corpus, thus fully explaining the phenomenon.
Scrambled words are part of my training corpus too, but it still takes me a lot longer than the machine, and I don't even need to give the machine a hint about what's going on. I just say "tell me what this says" and a moment later it does.
I question whether your bounding the human time to a minute is valuable here though. If the jumbled content were multiple pages long instead of only 23 words, would it be somehow more impressive despite the process being exactly the same?
> I am having a hard time overcoming the likelihood that scrambled and cipher-encoded words/solutions are part of the training corpus, thus fully explaining the phenomenon.
Scrambled words are part of my training corpus too, but it still takes me a lot longer than the machine, and I don't even need to give the machine a hint about what's going on. I just say "tell me what this says" and a moment later it does.