The antitrust angle makes no sense. Every device, even android and windows have defaut apps but to allow competition replacement apps are tolerated.
Regardless of size, no company owes users or the public free service using their servers. Fairness always cuts both ways. As an iPhone user, I demand apple provides me iMessage and ensures non-imessage clients can't message me.
Beeper can make a chat client and compete, they can advertisr in the appstore and elsewhere. Internet Explorer and now Edge are default on windows but Chrome is the number one browser (despite edge using chromium). Why can't beeper do the same?
This whole "eat the rich" crap needs to end. People like apple products the way they are. You succeed by figuring out why that is and competing. I used signal on iphone for a couple of years and then got rid of it for example. Didn't like the ui as much as imessage, can't import backups and lost all message and contact history I built on signal over many years. Similarly, i have had a lot of bad experience with usb-c but lightning has been great in every way for me but thanks to this same anti-capitalist attitude my choice was taken away.
My problem is not that the biggest company on earth is being treated unfairly and will lose chump change. My problem is that I am being affected! My choices and preferences are being taken away in an undemocraric and anti-capitalist way. I didn't have a vote on usb-c, to the contary I paid apple a lot of money for their product to show support. Same thing with I message, why donmt the voices mine and the majority who use iphones' voices not matter here? What is apple doing to prevent beeper from creating a chat client that does things just like imessage and then have other better features? Of all the chat clients I have used, imessage has superior ui and reliability, that's why I use it. They make it sound like iphone users don't know how to search the appstore for better chat clients. Outside the US, even on iphone people use whatsapp as a default for example, because that's what they prefer (international calling friendly) and most americans haven't even heard of viber.
Clearly othere have demonstrated that you can compete with default apps and even beat imessage in some markets outside the US by competing fairly. Now what is the reason you all have your torches lighted and pitchforks sharpened so that mine and iphone user's choices get limited once more?
Regardless of size, no company owes users or the public free service using their servers. Fairness always cuts both ways. As an iPhone user, I demand apple provides me iMessage and ensures non-imessage clients can't message me.
Beeper can make a chat client and compete, they can advertisr in the appstore and elsewhere. Internet Explorer and now Edge are default on windows but Chrome is the number one browser (despite edge using chromium). Why can't beeper do the same?
This whole "eat the rich" crap needs to end. People like apple products the way they are. You succeed by figuring out why that is and competing. I used signal on iphone for a couple of years and then got rid of it for example. Didn't like the ui as much as imessage, can't import backups and lost all message and contact history I built on signal over many years. Similarly, i have had a lot of bad experience with usb-c but lightning has been great in every way for me but thanks to this same anti-capitalist attitude my choice was taken away.
My problem is not that the biggest company on earth is being treated unfairly and will lose chump change. My problem is that I am being affected! My choices and preferences are being taken away in an undemocraric and anti-capitalist way. I didn't have a vote on usb-c, to the contary I paid apple a lot of money for their product to show support. Same thing with I message, why donmt the voices mine and the majority who use iphones' voices not matter here? What is apple doing to prevent beeper from creating a chat client that does things just like imessage and then have other better features? Of all the chat clients I have used, imessage has superior ui and reliability, that's why I use it. They make it sound like iphone users don't know how to search the appstore for better chat clients. Outside the US, even on iphone people use whatsapp as a default for example, because that's what they prefer (international calling friendly) and most americans haven't even heard of viber.
Clearly othere have demonstrated that you can compete with default apps and even beat imessage in some markets outside the US by competing fairly. Now what is the reason you all have your torches lighted and pitchforks sharpened so that mine and iphone user's choices get limited once more?