Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Believing he built two of the most important companies of the 21st century is part of the con. The first being that they are the most important and that he built them.



You have to be pretty dimwitted to think that either SpaceX or Tesla 1) are unimportant, or 2) would have reached anything close to their current level of success without Musk behind them.

Which makes his descent into erratic flimflammery all the more tragic.


> SpaceX or Tesla

Tesla was already built before Musk came along. He has helped maintain it, granted.

The second important company he built is OpenAI.


And arguably the reason it got so successful is because he conned people into believing that the cars they were buying could drive themselves.

SpaceX was luck. Luck he ran into the people he did (people like Zubrin) at that time he did. Luck that his Tesla con paid off.


Tesla didn't even have a car before Musk came along, let alone a path to profitability.

Whatever Musk's faults, it's really interesting to see people rewrite history.


> Whatever Musk's faults, it's really interesting to see people rewrite history.

Interestingly, one of Musk's faults is dishonestly rewriting history to make himself appear to be a co-founder of Tesla.


I'm not disputing that he has faults, it's just amazing how his real accomplishments get magnified or erased by dumb tweets in 2023, 10-15 years later. How many people fall for this stuff?


> How many people fall for this stuff?

And here are many of us saying the same about the people who fall for the cult of personality that surrounds this serial liar. To be fair, many of us are speaking with hindsight, as we too fell for it years ago, before his penchant for lying was laid bare.


Sure but Tesla and SpaceX objectively exist in the real world. Landing a freaking rocket booster is now routine.

It would be "cult of personality" to pretend the Musk did everything personally, obviously a lot of dedicated people contributed.. but it's just as dumb to act like he wasn't involved.


The cars produced by Tesla were not already built before his time, but the company Tesla was. You do realize that companies and cars are different things, right?


I can file an LLC by end of next week if I want.

A sustainable, profitable automobile manufacturer would be slightly more difficult.


Yup. Like with anything, maintenance is more important than construction. But this discussion is explicitly about the build, not the maintenance.

It is really interesting to see people rewrite what we're talking about.


You're saying that the real innovation was filing some paperwork with the name tesla?

Actually building any car at all was just maintenance?


There was no intent to say anything about innovation. That would be wildly off-topic. Can you point to where I spoke of it so that I can correct the comment for future readers?


You said "tesla was already built" before Musk came along.

He joined in 2004. First car in 2008. Path to profitability starting in 2015.

I'm inserting the opinion that maybe some of that stuff since 2004 was highly relevant to "building" Tesla.


I'm afraid I don't see anything about innovation in that quote. Did your copy/paste job get truncated?




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: