>It's inevitable that this question ends up at the supreme court. And the sooner the better IMO. It's clearly fair use. Generative agents will be seen legally as no different than a human artist leveraging the summation of their influences to create a new work.

Why do you think the architecture is important? If I have a computer program and it outputs the an entire copyrighted poem then the answer to "is this copyright violation" SHOULD NOT depends on the architecture of the program.