Sometimes two words are put together in an expression that does not mean what the two words seem to imply. For example, a hot dog is not a dog that is hot. The theory of finite fields is not applicable to agriculture, even though the fields they cultivate are finite. And dynamic programming is not an insanely general term referring to all programming that has some dynamic element to it.
Like I said, agree to disagree on the basics of the language; which is usually a conversation closer. Feel free to talk to a wall from here on out, if you insist on getting the last word in.
It literally is... I have no idea how you could even argue otherwise. So sure, let's agree to disagree on the basics of the English language.