Hey! I'm the developer of the FuryGPU, and it's very cool to see others working in a similar space - Doom is neat but Quake is where 3D graphics really came into their own.
For anyone curious, FuryGPU is a full mid-90s-era GPU built from the ground up which covers the entire stack of both hardware and software development. I designed a custom PCB to expose the PCIe lanes on the Kria K26 (Zynq UltraScale+) FPGA and allow for fast host-GPU communication, built and optimized the actual GPU hardware, wrote both an entirely custom graphics API to drive it as well as Windows drivers to have the OS interact with the hardware correctly, and finally ported Quake to that new API. It's been about three years of work and is still my first and only FPGA project.
Once everything is "finished," I do plan on open-sourcing the project. When and what that will look like depends on a lot of factors, but I've nearly ticked all the boxes I set for myself originally so it probably won't be too far in the future.
I started off creating a 2d focused GPU out of an esp32 for use with microcontrollers to accelerate graphics for resource constrained, and have "faked" 3d by drawing single color shaded triangles.
Ive been ping pinging between creating software 3d rendering support and learning digital circuits to graduate it into a full fpga based system.
What does the API look like?
I see you're calling it FuryGL so it must have some roots in OpenGL?
What did you have to change because of the underlying hardware? compared to OpenGL? Compared to what a software rasterizer API would look like?
You probably are familiar with Glide?
It's actually modeled very closely after Vulkan, but I couldn't think of a clever re-wording that would fit that and "Fury" together. I would have taken Vulkan's API as-is, but the hardware itself is fixed-function and does not support shaders, which Vulkan's API takes for granted; if you've seen Vulkan applications, it's nearly identical except that the pipelines do not include shaders. The way Vulkan (and D3D12) build and submit command buffers very closely matches how the hardware actually works, so it felt like a good fit.
If the hardware were ever to support actual shaders, I would be writing a full D3D-driver stack for it as Windows would then be able to utilize the GPU as a "real" GPU, rather than as just a display controller. As things are now, Windows has no idea that the device can do anything other than display a pre-composited desktop. When an application wants to utilize its 3D rendering capabilities, the driver actually does a mode swap similar to how the old Voodoo cards used to work - the OS still thinks it's rendering the desktop, but the hardware is actually displaying the application's content.
Believe it or not, I'm looking for this exact kind of thing. Also, a custom SoC that is close to x86. I am not a fan of modern x86, would want something closer to the original Pentium Pro.
If the FPGA contains a hard PCIe IP that can act as a host and the proper transceivers and the CPU implemented all of the necessary things to interface with it, it'd be about as difficult as writing a driver for any other machine. Actually building a board for the FPGA with all of the required power supplies, peripherals, and a PCIe host is not a trivial undertaking however, and an FPGA with a hard PCIe controller generally isn't cheap!
For anyone curious, FuryGPU is a full mid-90s-era GPU built from the ground up which covers the entire stack of both hardware and software development. I designed a custom PCB to expose the PCIe lanes on the Kria K26 (Zynq UltraScale+) FPGA and allow for fast host-GPU communication, built and optimized the actual GPU hardware, wrote both an entirely custom graphics API to drive it as well as Windows drivers to have the OS interact with the hardware correctly, and finally ported Quake to that new API. It's been about three years of work and is still my first and only FPGA project.
Once everything is "finished," I do plan on open-sourcing the project. When and what that will look like depends on a lot of factors, but I've nearly ticked all the boxes I set for myself originally so it probably won't be too far in the future.
Thanks for the plug!