Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I imagine anything backing that up lends some credibility to the true believers, likely why this poorly written paper has made it to hn.

A rule of thumb around here is I often measure my salt grain size by how self-important the article makes hners feel.




Are you aware that this "poorly written paper" is the work of a leading researcher of the origins of life on Earth?


Well it's true, or not, regardless of how any of us feel about it. It's just fun to wonder.


>Well it's true, or not, regardless of how any of us feel about it

Yes, but not with the same probabilities of being true in both cases (the cases being whether we feel good or bad about it).

Something makes it to HN because HNers like it. And not true things (feel good articles and popular sentiments) are more likely to be liked while not being true, compared to true but not likable stories.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: